Google makes screeching U-turn on vow to never weaponise AI as world faces chilling new era of warfare
Date: 2025-02-05
GOOGLE has dropped a bombshell U-turn that opens up the possibility of its AI tech powering weapons as the world enters a chilling new era of warfare.
The company had previously vowed its AI technology would never be used for purposes that were “likely to cause harm”.
South Korea has unveiled plans for the world’s first hydrogen-powered tank with an AI-controlled gun[/caption]
The US Navy recently deployed the world’s first AI warship.
USS Fitzgerald, first launched January 1994, has been redeployed with an innovative artificial intelligence program used by the Pentagon.
The software uses machine learning to predict maintenance issues before they have even happened, allowing crews to avoid major malfunctions and stay on the water.
It takes 10,000 sensor readings every second from all over the ship – including the hull and the mechanical and electrical systems.
The AI algorithm then interprets the data to make maintenance recommendations to the crew.
Militaries across the world are already racing to develop AI-powered weapons in a bid to find an edge of the battlefield.
The United States Marine Corps completed the second test flight of an unmanned aircraft called the Kratos XQ-58 Valkyrie, piloted by AI, in February last year.
This development marked a milestone in implementing Project Eagle, the service’s aviation modernization strategy.
Major General Scott Cain, Air Force Research Lab commander, said last year: “AI will be a critical element to future warfighting and the speed at which we’re going to have to understand the operational picture and make decisions.”
And South Korea has unveiled plans for a new AI-powered tank, which would be the world’s first powered by hydrogen.
Rotem, a subsidiary of motor company Hyundai, released its plans for these hi-tech war machines, that would be used by the South Korean army.
What are the arguments against AI?
ARTIFICIAL intelligence is a highly contested issue, and it seems everyone has a stance on it. Here are some common arguments against it:
Loss of jobs – Some industry experts argue that AI will create new niches in the job market, and as some roles are eliminated, others will appear. However, many artists and writers insist the argument is ethical, as generative AI tools are being trained on their work and wouldn’t function otherwise.
Ethics – When AI is trained on a dataset, much of the content is taken from the Internet. This is almost always, if not exclusively, done without notifying the people whose work is being taken.
Privacy – Content from personal social media accounts may be fed to language models to train them. Concerns have cropped up as Meta unveils its AI assistants across platforms like Facebook and Instagram. There have been legal challenges to this: in 2016, legislation was created to protect personal data in the EU, and similar laws are in the works in the United States.
Misinformation – As AI tools pulls information from the Internet, they may take things out of context or suffer hallucinations that produce nonsensical answers. Tools like Copilot on Bing and Google’s generative AI in search are always at risk of getting things wrong. Some critics argue this could have lethal effects – such as AI prescribing the wrong health information.
