A shadow of mistrust has fallen over England’s Freemasons, as the United Grand Lodge of England (UGLE) prepares to challenge a controversial new policy by the Metropolitan Police. The force now requires officers to declare if they are members, effectively treating Freemasonry with the same scrutiny as a criminal conviction.
The Met’s decision stems from concerns raised about public perception and potential conflicts of loyalty, particularly in light of the unsolved 1987 murder of private investigator Daniel Morgan. A panel investigating the case noted doubts among officers regarding whether Masonic oaths could supersede their duty to the public and each other.
However, the panel explicitly found no evidence of corrupt activity linked to Freemasonry in connection with the Morgan case or its subsequent investigation. Despite this, the recommendation to require disclosure of membership has ignited a fierce response from the UGLE, who argue the policy unfairly stigmatizes its members.
Adrian Marsh, Grand Secretary of the UGLE, stated the organization has “no choice but to take legal action” to defend the rights of its members – both past and present – who serve London with dedication. He emphasized the “obvious, detrimental impact” the policy will have on those within the Masonic community.
For decades, Freemasonry has been shrouded in intrigue, attracting over 200,000 members in England and Wales. Often associated with secret handshakes and elaborate ceremonies, the organization also highlights its substantial charitable contributions, raising millions annually.
Initiation into Freemasonry is a carefully orchestrated process, occurring four times a year. One anonymous member described the ceremonies as a “play” rooted in the symbolism of King Solomon’s Temple, with the Worshipful Master taking the lead role and new members learning specific answers to posed questions.
The UGLE maintains that significant progress has been made over the last 30 years to dispel misconceptions through increased transparency and openness. They believe the Met’s policy undermines these efforts, casting a broad and unwarranted suspicion over a community dedicated to ethical principles.
Commander Simon Messinger of the Met defended the decision, asserting that “public and staff confidence must take precedence over the secrecy of any membership organization.” The force has acknowledged receipt of the UGLE’s legal challenge but declined to offer further comment at this stage.
The legal battle promises to be a significant test of the balance between individual rights, public trust, and the long-held traditions of a society that has captivated and occasionally concerned the public for centuries.
