A wave of significant changes is sweeping through Venezuela’s institutions, as Acting President Delcy Rodríguez’s government recently announced key appointments that are already sparking intense debate and scrutiny.
Larry Devoe is now the nation’s attorney general, and Eglée González Lobato has been named the new ombudsman. These decisions, however, have been met with skepticism from numerous organizations questioning whether they signal a genuine move towards political transition following recent events.
Transparency Venezuela, a leading advocate for public accountability, immediately raised concerns about Devoe’s qualifications. His background, they point out, lacks the traditional experience expected of an attorney general – specifically, a history as a judge or prosecutor.
Devoe’s career has largely unfolded within government-affiliated bodies, including the National Human Rights Council, where he was tasked with implementing the President’s human rights policies. He also served as Venezuela’s representative before the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights, consistently defending the nation against allegations of abuse.
The concerns extend to González Lobato as well. Critics argue she doesn’t meet the constitutional requirements for the ombudsman position, which demands “proven competence in human rights matters.” Her prior role as legal counsel for the National Electoral Council raises further questions.
González Lobato has been a vocal critic of the opposition, publicly labeling them “traitors.” Ahead of contested elections, she repeatedly asserted that Maduro could win legitimately, a claim that ultimately aligned with the controversial results certified by the CNE despite widespread objections.
These appointments are not isolated incidents, but part of a larger pattern, according to a coalition of over 60 NGOs. They denounce the selection process as lacking transparency, citizen participation, and independence – fundamental principles enshrined in the constitution.
The organizations highlight Devoe’s past connections to bodies accused of political persecution and González Lobato’s limited experience in human rights. They are not convinced these choices represent a genuine effort to reform institutions vital to the country’s functioning.
Despite the reservations, these groups have issued a direct appeal to the new officials, urging them to uphold their ethical and legal obligations. They must act independently, guarantee human rights for all, and end the practice of political persecution.
Specific demands include the immediate release of arbitrarily detained prisoners and a thorough investigation into crimes against humanity. The NGOs are also calling for full cooperation with the International Criminal Court and the United Nations.
Furthermore, they advocate for Venezuela’s re-engagement with the Inter-American Human Rights System, a crucial step towards reversing the criminalization of dissent and rebuilding public trust. These actions, they believe, are essential to demonstrate a true commitment to change.
The government is currently attempting to project an image of “reinstitutionalization” and modernization to the international community. However, many observers remain unconvinced, arguing that these appointments reinforce the existing power structures and offer little evidence of genuine reform.
