A sweeping investigation is underway, initiated by President Ferdinand R. Marcos, Jr., promising a thorough examination of evidence concerning former Speaker Ferdinand Martin Romualdez and former Ako Bicol party-list Representative Elizaldy Co. The probe centers on allegations of irregularities within infrastructure projects, potentially leading to serious criminal charges.
The President announced the referral of all findings from the Department of Public Works and Highways (DPWH) and the Independent Commission for Infrastructure (ICI) directly to the Ombudsman. This move signals a commitment to pursue justice, regardless of the individuals involved, and ensures an independent review of the gathered information.
Potential charges outlined include plunder, anti-graft offenses, and indirect bribery – accusations that strike at the heart of public trust. The investigation will meticulously verify the evidence before any formal case is filed, following wherever the facts may lead.
The DPWH and ICI jointly recommended these charges based on a detailed report examining contracts awarded to Sunwest Inc. and Hi-Tone Construction between 2016 and 2025. This report alleges improper involvement by Romualdez and Co in questionable flood control projects.
Crucially, the evidence includes sworn testimony from a former security aide to Representative Co, retired Sgt. Orly Guteza, who provided statements during Senate hearings. His account adds a layer of personal insight to the documented financial discrepancies.
Specific violations cited in the report point to breaches of the Plunder Act, the Anti-Graft and Corrupt Practices Act, and provisions within the Revised Penal Code concerning direct bribery. These are serious legal claims with potentially severe consequences.
Former Speaker Romualdez has publicly stated his willingness to cooperate with the investigation and defend himself against any accusations. He previously denied similar allegations during a Senate hearing, maintaining his innocence.
However, Representative Co has taken a different approach, claiming he was deliberately used as a scapegoat in a larger scheme. He alleges significant budget “insertions” totaling P100 billion orchestrated by the President, Romualdez, and other Cabinet members.
Co asserts he possesses evidence – receipts and names – to support his claims, promising to reveal the truth and expose what he describes as a web of deceit. His statement dramatically shifts the narrative, introducing counter-accusations at the highest levels.
The unfolding situation promises a complex and potentially explosive investigation, with far-reaching implications for Philippine politics and public accountability. The Ombudsman’s findings will be pivotal in determining the next steps and ensuring justice is served.
