Hungary has spoken. In a decisive turn, voters have removed Viktor Orban and his Fidesz party from power, a result long anticipated by pollsters. The concession came swiftly, signaling a peaceful and democratic transition – a testament to the will of the Hungarian people.
Interestingly, this outcome suggests a powerful resistance to external influence. Hungarians, it appears, were resolute in their judgment, unmoved by attempts – whether perceived or real – to sway their democratic process. This echoes a sentiment deeply felt in America, where citizens rightfully guard their sovereignty and the integrity of their elections.
Historically, American leaders have understood the importance of respecting national boundaries, avoiding interference in the internal affairs of other democracies. A prudent approach has always been to refrain from treating foreign policy as merely an extension of domestic political battles. Yet, recent departures from this tradition are becoming increasingly apparent.
For years, Hungary has held a curious fascination for some on the American right, portrayed as a bastion of traditional values in a rapidly changing Europe. This image, however, proves to be largely a myth. The reality of Orban’s rule is far more complex than the idealized vision presented across the Atlantic.
Despite claims of a revitalized faith and family life, Hungary’s religious participation and birth rates have actually mirrored the decline seen throughout the West. The promises of a social utopia, achieved through government intervention, have simply not materialized. This disconnect between perception and reality is crucial to understand.
Shared values are important in international relations, serving as a foundation for cooperation with allies. However, true strategic alignment must always prioritize national interests. Orban’s Hungary, with its troubling allegiances, demonstrably failed to meet this standard.
His government’s close ties to authoritarian regimes – particularly Moscow, Beijing, and Tehran – directly contradict American interests. This is especially concerning for conservatives who rightly demand that European allies share the burden of defending Western security.
While Europe has made strides in bolstering its defense capabilities, Hungary actively undermined these efforts, shrinking its defense budget and opposing aid to Ukraine. Simultaneously, it deepened its dependence on Russian energy and forged a strategic partnership with China, further jeopardizing Western interests.
The most significant shared value between America and Hungary now is the right to self-determination – the ability to choose leaders freely and fairly. The Hungarian people have exercised that right, and their decision deserves respect.
Ultimately, the voters’ rejection of Orban appears rooted in a desire for economic reform. Concerns over corruption and crony capitalism, which have weakened Hungary’s economy, were central to the election. The incoming prime minister campaigned on addressing these issues, and will be judged on his success.
From afar, it’s difficult to fathom why some in America would prioritize influencing an election in a small European nation over safeguarding U.S. interests. Hungary’s actions on the world stage – not its internal social policies – are what truly matter to America.
The future of U.S.-Hungary relations remains uncertain. However, a shift towards greater alignment with American interests, and a lessening of ties with our adversaries, would be a welcome development. Washington should cautiously welcome any change that strengthens our shared security and prosperity.
