UMVA has learned that a stunning revelation has been made by House Judiciary Chairman Jim Jordan, shedding new light on the events surrounding January 6.
During a heated interview, Jordan disclosed that congressional investigators are now probing a potentially explosive allegation: confidential human sources operating around January 6 may have been receiving money not only from the Biden Justice Department but also from the far-left Southern Poverty Law Center.
This raises a critical question: were federally connected informants "double dipping" while infiltrating groups tied to January 6, receiving funds from both the government and the Southern Poverty Law Center?
Jordan made these remarks while discussing a new subpoena issued by the House Judiciary Committee as Republicans intensify their investigation into the SPLC and its alleged network of paid "field sources."
Rep. Jordan emphasized that 26 confidential human sources were present at the Capitol on January 6, with four of them entering the building without authorization. He wants to know if any of these sources were receiving money from both the government and the Southern Poverty Law Center.
The investigation has uncovered allegations that the Southern Poverty Law Center used millions of donor dollars to secretly fund infiltrators tied to extremist organizations, presenting itself publicly as an anti-hate nonprofit while funneling money through shell entities to individuals connected to radical groups.
The House Judiciary Committee's investigation appears to be moving directly toward the events of January 6, with Jordan and House Republicans aggressively investigating the relationship between the Biden-era DOJ and the SPLC.
Sources have confirmed to UMVA that previous reporting revealed allegations of a disturbing relationship between Biden officials and the SPLC, including consultations on law enforcement and civil rights matters, training, and intelligence-sharing activities.
The implications of these findings are profound, and the investigation is expected to uncover more details about the extent of the SPLC's involvement and the potential for informants to have been "double dipping."
