A proposed overhaul of the Philippine school calendar, shifting to a three-term system, is facing scrutiny from business leaders who question its impact on preparing students for the workforce. While the government aims to maximize learning time and address disruptions, concerns are rising that a calendar change alone won’t solve deeper issues within the education system.
Leaders from prominent business groups suggest that focusing on curriculum reform and educational quality is far more critical than simply restructuring the school year. Donald Patrick Lim, President of the Management Association of the Philippines, emphasized the need for careful study, stating that improved outcomes, not a new calendar, should be the priority.
A key concern revolves around potential misalignment with the established rhythms of the business world. The proposed trimestral calendar could disrupt internship cycles and hiring periods, creating logistical challenges for both students and employers.
Beyond scheduling conflicts, the shift could also introduce significant financial burdens. Families and schools may face increased costs, while teachers could experience a heavier workload, potentially diminishing the quality of instruction.
The Economy and Development Council recently approved the Department of Education’s proposal, envisioning the new system beginning in the 2026-2027 school year. Officials believe it will mitigate learning losses caused by weather-related disruptions and holidays.
Secretary Arsenio Balisacan, chairing the council, highlighted the commitment to building a competitive workforce through evidence-based solutions. The plan divides the 201 school days into three terms: June-September, September-December, and January-March.
Sergio Ortiz-Luis, Jr., of the Employers Confederation of the Philippines, acknowledged the potential for alignment with global practices. However, he cautioned that Philippine schools may lack the necessary resources for a successful transition, citing existing classroom shortages and increased maintenance costs.
The disruption of learning due to external factors is a pressing issue. The Department of Education reported 53 school days lost in the 2023-2024 school year, with typhoons and extreme heat accounting for the majority of these interruptions.
Despite the government’s optimism, some believe the impact on job readiness will be minimal. Ebb Hinchliffe, Executive Director of the American Chamber of Commerce of the Philippines, stressed the importance of curriculum quality and addressing the ongoing classroom shortage.
Interestingly, some institutions are already operating under a trimestral system. Rafael Ongpin of the Makati Business Club pointed to the De La Salle schools as an example, suggesting they successfully meet the demands of industry, offering a potential model for wider implementation.
