A political firestorm erupted in Utah as Governor Spencer Cox and legislative leaders ordered an independent investigation into a state Supreme Court justice. The probe centers on Justice Diana Hagen, appointed by the governor himself, and allegations of an inappropriate relationship with an attorney involved in a fiercely contested redistricting case.
The accusations surfaced through a complaint filed by Hagen’s ex-husband, detailing what he described as “inappropriate” text messages exchanged between the justice and David Reymann. Reymann represented progressive voting rights groups challenging a Republican-drawn congressional map designed to secure four red seats for the state.
Justice Hagen was part of the unanimous court decision that ultimately struck down the Republican redistricting plan in July 2024. This ruling dramatically reshaped the political landscape, flipping one of Utah’s congressional seats from red to blue in anticipation of the 2026 midterm elections.
Both Hagen and Reymann vehemently deny the allegations. The timing and nature of their interactions have become central to the controversy, raising questions about potential conflicts of interest during the redistricting proceedings.
An initial investigation by the Utah Judicial Conduct Commission, an independent body tasked with overseeing judicial ethics, concluded without further action. However, this outcome failed to quell concerns among state leaders.
Governor Cox, Senate President Stuart Adams, and House Speaker Mike Schultz jointly announced the new investigation, emphasizing the need for complete transparency. They acknowledged the polarizing nature of the redistricting decision and the critical importance of maintaining public trust in the judiciary.
Justice Hagen released a statement asserting she never had a conflict of interest. She highlighted her voluntary recusal from any cases involving Mr. Reymann beginning in May 2025, and pointed to the Judicial Conduct Commission’s dismissal of the complaint as evidence of her ethical conduct.
Records indicate that discussions of divorce between Hagen and her husband began in September 2024, with interactions involving Reymann occurring later that year. A one-on-one meeting between Hagen and Reymann reportedly didn’t take place until 2025, according to reports.
The decision to launch a second, independent investigation underscores the gravity of the allegations and the potential for lasting damage to the integrity of Utah’s highest court. The outcome will likely have significant implications for the state’s political future.
State leaders stressed that the new investigation is essential to fully address unanswered questions and restore public confidence, particularly given the high stakes surrounding the redistricting case and its impact on upcoming elections.
