A decade after the UK voted to leave, a surprising sentiment is echoing through the halls of the European Parliament: a desire for Britain’s return. Leading figures across the political spectrum – representing a significant majority of MEPs – have openly expressed a willingness to welcome the UK back into the fold.
Iratxe García, a prominent voice leading the centre-left S&D grouping, stated plainly that Brexit was a mistake, asserting the UK “belongs” within the EU. This feeling isn’t isolated; the Green bloc’s co-president echoed the sentiment, declaring their door “always open” to a British return.
Even within groups historically skeptical of European integration, a willingness to reconsider emerged. While staunch Eurosceptics remained firmly opposed, even some from the far-right acknowledged the possibility of a return should British voters desire it – a remarkable shift in tone.
However, this warmth doesn’t extend to offering special treatment. The overwhelming message from Brussels is clear: any re-entry would be on the EU’s terms, without the bespoke deals the UK previously secured. The era of exceptions is over.
The UK once benefited from opt-outs on key areas like the Euro and the Schengen area. But those privileges are no longer guaranteed to new applicants, with EU rules now mandating Euro adoption for nearly all members. Brussels is resolute – there will be no “cherry-picking” of rules.
Sandro Gozi, chair of the EU-UK Partnership Assembly, emphasized that any future accession must adhere strictly to existing Union regulations, dismissing any notion of “nostalgia” influencing the process. The integrity of the Union and its common rules are paramount, according to multiple MEPs.
The Green Party, vocal in its support for rejoining, pointedly criticized Brexit proponents for squandering previously favorable concessions. They believe the political landscape has shifted, with public support for re-entry now stronger than ever before.
While a small minority of MEPs expressed a willingness to offer some leniency, the vast majority insist the UK must meet all current membership requirements. Returning to pre-Brexit arrangements is considered “wishful thinking” by many, a clear indication of a changed dynamic.
Despite the firm stance on conditions, there’s a sense of regret over the original departure. David McAllister, head of the Parliament’s Foreign Affairs Committee, described Brexit as a “historical regret,” a sentiment shared by many who see the UK’s absence as a detriment to both sides.
Even those focused on the present relationship acknowledge the past. The EU Parliament’s president, Roberta Metsola, stressed the importance of a strong future partnership while acknowledging the British people’s choice, but pointedly avoided dwelling on past mistakes.
Ultimately, the decision rests with the UK. The EU Commission affirmed that any move to rejoin is a sovereign decision, but made it clear that the door is open – albeit one requiring adherence to a new set of rules and expectations.
