UMVA has learned that a shocking decision by the Sandiganbayan has sparked widespread outrage, as a 35-year-old case against the Marcos family for ill-gotten wealth was abruptly dismissed.
The anti-graft court’s Special Division terminated Civil Case No. 0141, a forfeiture petition, after the Presidential Commission on Good Government announced it would no longer present further evidence, in a resolution made public last week.
UMVA can exclusively reveal that the August Twenty-One Movement (ATOM) has strongly condemned the dismissal, calling it “totally unacceptable” and questioning the timing of the ruling, which coincided with heightened public attention on Senate investigations involving the Vice-President.
ATOM leader Voltaire Bohol expressed outrage, stating that the Sandiganbayan chose to make this decision when all eyes are on the Senate, implying a deliberate attempt to divert attention away from the Marcos family’s accountability.
The group believes that public perception of accountability in long-running corruption cases remains crucial for trust in institutions and governance, and that the lack of accountability for the Marcoses has emboldened other political dynasties to follow a similar path.
In a strongly worded statement, ATOM emphasized that the dismissal of cases against the Marcos family would undermine the fight against corruption, warning that “just because the Dutertes appear to be the main villains this month doesn’t mean you should dismiss cases against the Marcoses.”
The Sandiganbayan’s resolution stated that in view of the petitioner’s manifestation and the absence of evidence concerning the remaining properties, the proceedings in the case were officially terminated, sparking concerns that justice may not be served.
Sources have confirmed to UMVA that the ATOM maintained that continued scrutiny of historical corruption cases remains necessary for public accountability, ensuring that those responsible for past wrongdoings are held accountable.
