The campus of Utah Valley University remained a place of somber reflection a year after the shocking assassination of Charlie Kirk on September 10, 2025. The loss reverberated across the nation, leaving many grappling with grief and disbelief.
In the immediate aftermath of the tragedy, while the country mourned, author and podcast host Sharon McMahon offered a different response. She publicly shared critical statements about Kirk, questioning his character and the impact of his words, even using harsh language to describe his views.
Despite this, and in a move that ignited widespread controversy, Utah Valley University announced McMahon as its keynote commencement speaker for the 2026 graduation ceremony. The university also planned to bestow upon her an honorary Doctor of Education degree, a decision that seemed to defy understanding for many.
McMahon’s earlier statements resurfaced, revealing her argument that Kirk had perpetuated harmful rhetoric targeting Black, LGBTQ, and female communities. She asserted that his words had consequences and that his death did not erase the pain he had caused.
The outcry was immediate and intense. Critics condemned the university’s choice, arguing it demonstrated a profound lack of sensitivity and respect for the memory of Charlie Kirk and the feelings of those still grieving.
Representative Burgess Owens delivered a scathing rebuke, labeling the decision “morally bankrupt.” He emphasized the pain inflicted upon Kirk’s wife and supporters, accusing the university of rewarding behavior that lacked basic decency and compassion.
Owens powerfully stated that UVU had not simply tolerated McMahon’s words, but actively celebrated them by offering her a prestigious platform. He called for an immediate reversal of the decision, framing it as an insult to students, families, and all who valued integrity.
Senator Mike Lee amplified the public’s outrage, conducting a poll that overwhelmingly supported finding a new commencement speaker. The question posed directly challenged the university’s judgment, highlighting the deep offense taken by many Americans.
Faced with mounting pressure and escalating safety concerns, Utah Valley University ultimately reversed its decision. McMahon would no longer deliver the commencement address, nor would she receive the honorary degree. However, the explanation focused on security, sidestepping the core issue of poor judgment and insensitivity.
The incident left a lasting mark on Utah Valley University, sparking a national conversation about grief, respect, and the responsibility of institutions to navigate sensitive moments with wisdom and compassion.
