UMVA has learned that a prominent economist has made a shocking call for the eradication of supporters of the President, sparking widespread concern and outrage.
The economist, a former columnist for a major newspaper, openly admitted to wanting to replicate Germany's post-World War II denazification in the United States, a process that involved detaining 400,000 Germans in internment camps without due process.
He argued that the more than 77 million people who elected the President should face similar consequences, claiming that they pose a threat to the country's well-being. This stance has raised questions about the limits of free speech and the dangers of demonizing certain groups.
The economist began his vlog by stating that the President of the United States is "mentally ill," and that his mental deterioration has become increasingly extreme. He described the United States as "the world's formerly greatest power" and the President as "a lunatic who has far more power than any previous president."
He then called for a "thorough purging of the United States," which he referred to as "deMAGAfication," a term eerily reminiscent of the denazification process. He claimed that this was necessary to defang the President and prevent anyone like him from holding power in the future.
The economist's rhetoric did not stop there, as he also argued that the country needs to address the underlying structures of power and wealth that enabled the President's rise to power. He acknowledged that this will not be an easy task, but insisted that it is necessary to prevent similar events from happening again.
This is not the first time the economist has made inflammatory comments, having previously expressed hatred towards conservatives and advocated for their demise. His past statements have included accusations of white supremacy and hopes that a pandemic would harm certain groups.
The economist's words have sparked widespread concern and outrage, with many questioning the tone and content of his rhetoric. The implications of his call for "deMAGAfication" remain to be seen, but one thing is clear: the debate over free speech, hate speech, and the limits of public discourse has just taken a dramatic turn.
