A small-town saloon in Eagle, Idaho, ignited a firestorm of controversy with an unprecedented offer: a month of free beer for anyone who actively assists federal immigration authorities.
The Old State Saloon announced the promotion, promising rewards for evidence – photos, videos, details – leading to the identification and deportation of individuals. The offer wasn’t subtle; it was a direct call to action, publicly acknowledging and incentivizing collaboration with ICE.
The bar even extended a peculiar invitation to those facing deportation: one free beer before authorities arrived. A reservation was encouraged, adding a chillingly casual tone to a deeply serious situation.
The Department of Homeland Security responded to the announcement with visible surprise, sharing a GIF that quickly drew a defiant retort from the saloon: “Let’s go! Deport them all!” This exchange amplified the already escalating tension.
Predictably, the promotion sparked immediate and intense backlash. Social media platforms swiftly removed the saloon’s posts, but the bar owner responded by publicly mocking the criticism, sharing screenshots of negative reviews labeled as coming from “the loser LEFT.”
Behind the controversial initiative is Mark Fitzpatrick, the saloon’s owner, known for his outspoken conservative views. He previously launched “Heterosexual Awesomeness Month,” offering free beer to straight patrons as a response to Pride Month celebrations.
The saloon’s identity is firmly rooted in these beliefs, proudly proclaiming itself the “Birthplace of Heterosexual Awesomeness Month” and selling merchandise with provocative slogans. This latest promotion appears to be a continuation of that established brand.
The offer hasn’t remained theoretical. Ryan Spoon, a local Republican official, has already claimed his reward. The saloon publicly celebrated his contribution, declaring him a “true American Hero” and granting him a month of free beer for providing evidence that led to an ICE arrest.
Spoon’s success underscores the saloon’s commitment to the promotion, turning a contentious political stance into a tangible reward system. The offer continues, raising questions about civic responsibility, public safety, and the role of businesses in immigration enforcement.
The situation has quickly become a flashpoint, highlighting deep divisions within the community and sparking a national debate about the boundaries of political expression and the consequences of incentivizing immigration enforcement.
