A surprising rebuke echoed through the New York Times summit this week as actress Halle Berry publicly questioned Governor Gavin Newsom’s presidential potential. Her words, delivered with pointed clarity, stemmed from Newsom’s repeated vetoes of a bill addressing menopause – a decision Berry felt devalued women in midlife.
Berry didn’t mince words, stating Newsom “probably should not be our next president,” a declaration that visibly stunned the audience. The comment wasn’t a whispered aside, but a direct challenge leveled at a politician often embraced by the Hollywood elite.
The moment sparked immediate discussion, with observers noting the potential shift in Hollywood’s traditionally unwavering support for Democratic figures. Previously, enthusiasm for Vice President Kamala Harris was palpable; now, attention is turning to Newsom, and with it, a willingness to voice dissent.
Commentators have pointed to Berry’s courage, suggesting her candidness might come at a cost – potentially excluding her from certain late-night talk show appearances. However, her statement resonated with a broader critique of Newsom’s governance.
Beyond the specific veto, concerns exist regarding Newsom’s overall record and whether his approach to leading California would translate effectively to the nation. Despite his polished image, some question his suitability for the highest office.
Newsom is currently in the final year of his governorship, a period marked by two attempted recalls. While he hasn’t formally announced a run for the presidency in 2028, speculation continues to swirl around his ambitions.
Adding fuel to the fire, a recent trip to South Carolina with Representative Jim Clyburn saw Clyburn inadvertently introduce Newsom as a presidential candidate, quickly correcting himself but revealing a sentiment already circulating among some Democrats.
The incident underscores a growing undercurrent of questioning surrounding Newsom, even within his own party, as he navigates the political landscape and considers his future.
