A Boston-based LGBTQ+ organization, OUTnewcomers, found itself at the center of a funding dispute after unveiling a program designed to offer “wellness” perks to newly arrived migrants. The initiative, dubbed “Belonging Matters,” proposed providing up to $500 in allowances for services like yoga, massage, and even hairstyling, aiming to ease the transition for those navigating a new city and culture.
The program quickly ran into friction with city officials, who expressed concerns that the use of grant funds deviated from their original expectations. A city spokesperson confirmed that no funds had been distributed for the proposed wellness vouchers, emphasizing the $7,500 grant was specifically earmarked for mental health services – not creative arts or gym memberships.
OUTnewcomers had been one of 45 organizations to receive a portion of a larger $200,000 fund approved last year to bolster LGBTQ+ communities within Boston. The initial announcement from the Mayor’s Office of LGBTQ+ Advancement highlighted a commitment to directly supporting trusted community organizations.
A discrepancy emerged between the program’s initial presentation and its later characterization. While initially advertised with potential allowances of $250 to $500, OUTnewcomers later described the vouchers as being valued at $50 or less, raising questions about transparency and program scope.
Before the funding was ultimately returned, OUTnewcomers made the difficult decision to pause “Belonging Matters,” citing escalating “security concerns.” Founder Sal Khan explained the decision was rooted in prioritizing the safety of both the organization’s team and the community members they serve.
The organization ultimately announced it would cease all related programming and return the $7,500 grant to the mayor’s office. This move followed a period of intense scrutiny and highlighted the complexities of grant distribution and oversight within the city of Boston.
Khan, in a statement, emphasized that OUTnewcomers’ work has always been guided by principles of care, dignity, and community support. However, the severity of threats received made continuing the program safely impossible, forcing a painful but necessary retreat.
The situation underscores the challenges faced by community organizations navigating the delicate balance between providing vital services and ensuring the safety and security of those they aim to help, all while adhering to the stipulations of public funding.
