A storm of criticism erupted online Monday as renowned horror author Stephen King posted a scathing critique of former President Donald Trump, sparking immediate and widespread backlash.
King’s post asserted that Trump “has never had a child,” among other claims regarding his personal and professional life, including failed businesses and a lack of practical experience. The statement ignited a firestorm of responses questioning its accuracy and intent.
Accounts across the political spectrum swiftly challenged King’s assertions. “Trump literally has 5 kids. What is this sh--?” posted Libs of TikTok, while others expressed disbelief and pointed out the factual inaccuracies.
Conservative commentators joined the chorus of dissent, with one suggesting a “25th Amendment” measure to restrict access to King’s social media account. The speed and intensity of the reaction underscored the sensitivity of the topic.
The controversy unfolded as Trump prepares to address the nation in a report to Congress on his administration’s work. The timing amplified the impact of King’s remarks, turning them into a major talking point.
Adding another layer to the situation, King had previously reshared a similar post targeting Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, criticizing her lack of children and professional experience. This parallel drew accusations of plagiarism and hypocrisy.
“You literally plagiarized an entire post…which was about AOC… and then applied it to Trump…… for whom it isn’t true and doesn’t make any sense. Why are you plagiarizing?” questioned a former Department of Energy scientist on the platform.
This incident isn’t isolated. King has a history of using strong language on social media to express his political views, previously labeling Trump a “traitorous, Putin-loving dipsh--!” and comparing ICE to the Nazi Gestapo.
His past comments, often delivered with similar vehemence, have consistently drawn attention and debate. The latest post continues a pattern of outspoken political commentary from the celebrated author.
Despite requests for clarification, King’s office has remained silent regarding the motivation behind the post and the accuracy of the claims made. The silence only fueled further speculation and criticism.
