A new report reveals a stark disconnect between the progress universities claim to be making against antisemitism and the experiences of Jewish students on campus. While institutional policies are improving, a troubling undercurrent of hate persists, leaving many students feeling vulnerable and unsafe.
The 2026 Campus Antisemitism Report Card, assessing 150 colleges and universities, shows a dramatic shift in grades – more than doubling the number receiving A’s and B’s since 2024. Nearly 60% of schools now earn top marks, a significant leap attributed to policy changes, governmental oversight, and pressure from advocacy groups.
These improvements include widespread prohibitions on unauthorized encampments and disruptive protests, alongside a growing number of schools explicitly addressing antisemitism in their non-discrimination policies. Over half now have dedicated entities focused on addressing antisemitism and supporting Jewish life.
However, the report’s most unsettling finding lies in the experiences of students themselves. Nearly half of non-Jewish students admit to witnessing or experiencing anti-Jewish behavior in the past year, and almost as many harbor at least one anti-Jewish attitude. This suggests a deeply ingrained bias that policies alone cannot erase.
The report highlights a dangerous misconception fueling the problem: the conflation of anti-Zionism with legitimate political discourse. Leaders argue that denying Israel’s right to exist isn’t a valid viewpoint, but a dangerous incitement to violence.
The gap between policy and reality points to a critical need to address faculty attitudes and ensure that antisemitism training is more than just a formality. Simply adopting policies isn’t enough; they must be actively implemented and reinforced.
The problem extends beyond the campus gates, fueled by online narratives and misinformation. A “360-degree approach” is needed, tackling antisemitism in classrooms, dorms, online spaces, and everywhere in between.
With the ongoing conflict involving Iran, concerns are rising that a new wave of antisemitic activity could erupt on campuses, mirroring the surge seen after the October 7th attacks. The potential for blaming Jewish people for the war is a significant worry.
University leaders are now tasked with translating policy improvements into tangible changes in the lived experiences of their students. Protecting free speech is vital, but it cannot come at the expense of safety and inclusivity. The challenge now is to ensure that progress on paper translates into a truly welcoming and secure environment for all students.
The report serves as a crucial reminder that the fight against antisemitism is far from over, and requires sustained effort, honest self-assessment, and a commitment to fostering a campus climate of respect and understanding.
