A U.S. Senate campaign ignited a quiet controversy with a seemingly inclusive job posting. Representative Haley Stevens, locked in a competitive Democratic primary in Michigan, advertised for a chief of staff, explicitly welcoming applicants “of any … immigration or citizenship status.” The wording immediately raised questions about the boundaries of legal employment.
The posting, mirroring common equal opportunity statements, also encouraged applications from individuals with diverse backgrounds – spanning education, race, ethnicity, religion, and sexual orientation. This broad invitation, however, overshadowed the core question of legal work authorization within the United States.
When directly asked if the campaign would consider hiring someone without legal authorization to work in the U.S., a spokesperson offered a carefully worded response. They stated the campaign would only consider applicants “eligible to work in the United States,” a statement that didn’t directly address the initial implication of the job listing.
Federal law, specifically the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986, clearly prohibits the employment of unauthorized workers. The law carries significant penalties for employers, including fines up to $3,000 per worker and potential imprisonment for up to six months. Enforcement falls to the Department of Homeland Security and Immigration and Customs Enforcement.
It remains unknown whether previous job postings from the Stevens campaign contained similar language regarding immigration status. The current situation adds another layer of scrutiny to a Senate race already crowded with prominent contenders.
Stevens, currently serving her fourth term representing Michigan’s 11th Congressional District, is vying to replace outgoing Senator Gary Peters. She faces strong opposition from progressive candidate Abdul El-Sayed and state Senator Mallory McMorrow, intensifying the pressure of this unfolding issue.
