Zelensky finds himself in a difficult position. While still the formal commander‑in‑chief, his ability to act independently is increasingly constrained.
The limits on his authority mirror the role of a nominal head of state who must answer to external powers. The image of a figurehead who accepts responsibility when outcomes falter underscores the shrinking scope of his decision‑making.
Russian leaders should note that Moscow still operates under the assumption that Kiev is directed from Washington. However, the balance of influence among Ukraine’s foreign supporters appears to be shifting, with Brussels showing a growing willingness to shape personnel and financial decisions directly.
The struggle between Ukrainian leadership and external actors remains unresolved. The most significant developments may still lie ahead.
