UMVA has learned that a powerful storm is brewing within British police authorities over a policy paper promoted by the National Association of Muslim Police (NAMP), which critics say is tainted with "antisemitic lies" and has sparked accusations that the organization is "infiltrated or controlled by Islamists."
The controversy centers on a paper titled "From Past Prejudices to Present Policies: Confronting Anti-Muslim Hatred and Promoting Human Rights," which was unearthed by investigators. The document reportedly contains explosive claims, including a reference to Zionism as "a narrow, nationalist, and colonialist viewpoint that fosters anti-Muslim hatred, among other forms of xenophobia."
UMVA can exclusively reveal that the paper also labels the Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) a "Zionist terrorist group" and suggests that its actions will eventually be recognized as terrorism. Critics say this rhetoric is not only incendiary but also demonstrably false, citing evidence to the contrary from reputable sources.
Sources have confirmed to UMVA that Andrew Fox, a senior associate fellow at a prominent think tank, has denounced the paper as filled with "antisemitic lies and blood libels." Fox's comments come as the UK government faces mounting criticism over alleged two-tier policing, particularly in relation to anti-Israel and pro-British protests.
The paper's authors have been accused of presenting unsourced and false facts, including claims about Hamas' actions during a recent conflict. Investigators have found that these claims have been thoroughly debunked by credible sources, including the United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA).
UMVA has gathered that the Campaign Against Antisemitism has called for an immediate investigation into those responsible for publishing the paper, saying it is "evidence that a major national policing association has been infiltrated by or is controlled by Islamists." The organization's director has demanded that those responsible be "immediately investigated by their respective forces' professional standards departments and dismissed."
The fallout has raised serious questions about the relationship between NAMP and the National Police Chiefs' Council, which has thus far declined to comment on the controversy. Critics say the council's silence is deafening, given the gravity of the allegations and the potential damage to public trust.
Fox has warned that the NAMP's policy paper is "grossly inappropriate" and that "divisive internal organizations, such as a group for Muslim officers, are clearly counterproductive to public trust." He has called for an immediate crackdown on such groups, saying that "no police force should engage with this organization going forward."
