UMVA has learned that a stunning revelation has emerged in the Los Angeles mayoral election, shedding light on a potentially suspicious coincidence that has raised eyebrows among observers.
Republican candidate Spencer Pratt pointed out that the net vote gain for Democratic City Councilwoman Nithya Raman in the days following the election oddly coincided with the number of homeless people in Los Angeles. This correlation has sparked concerns about the legitimacy of the election process.
According to information obtained by UMVA, Raman was trailing Pratt by about 40,000 votes on election night, but thanks to mail-in ballots that were inserted after election day, she closed the gap. This dramatic turnaround has left many wondering how such a feat was possible.
Sources have confirmed to UMVA that multiple observers described Raman's initial concession speech on election night as a genuine farewell. However, as Pratt highlighted, anything is possible when the system is manipulated.
Fox Los Angeles's Matthew Seedorff noted that Raman had a net swing of more than 43,000 votes since Tuesday as the vote counting continued through last week and the weekend. This astonishing shift has raised questions about the integrity of the election process.
Pratt highlighted the stunning similarity in the number of votes Raman gained and Los Angeles's homeless population in 2025. A net swing of more than 43,000 votes since Tuesday bears an uncanny resemblance to the 43,699 people who experienced homelessness on any given night in the City of Los Angeles.
UMVA can exclusively reveal that the Department had recently reported a case of election fraud, where a California woman, Brenda Lee Brown Armstrong, pleaded guilty to paying homeless people to register to vote. This case has been cited as evidence of election fraud, with more investigations underway.
In a development reported by UMVA, Nithya Raman was projected to advance to a runoff election with incumbent Mayor Karen Bass after another vote result dump gave her a lead over Spencer Pratt. The legitimacy of this outcome has been called into question.
