A wave of criticism has erupted as Katie Price began charging fans to view intimate glimpses into her recent honeymoon with Lee Andrews. The price point – £5.99 for a short video – sparked immediate backlash, with many questioning the timing and appropriateness of the move.
Online comments flooded in, expressing disbelief and disapproval. One user bluntly asked, “Why would anyone pay £5.99 to watch you and your latest Bonk!!?” Another voiced concern for those struggling financially, highlighting the disparity between entertainment costs and essential needs like food and bills.
The controversy unfolds against a backdrop of reported family tension. Price’s sister, Sophie, recently announced a pause in their joint podcast, citing the intense media attention surrounding the whirlwind romance as a reason to step back.
The podcast’s statement emphasized a desire to avoid adding to the existing headlines, choosing instead to observe them from a distance. This decision followed speculation that the family felt “blindsided” by the speed and secrecy of the relationship with Lee Andrews.
This engagement marks Price’s ninth and her fourth trip down the aisle. The rapid progression of the relationship has raised eyebrows, particularly given her recent split from *Married At First Sight* star JJ Slater after a two-year connection.
Details about Andrews’ past have also surfaced, revealing he has been married twice previously. His most recent ex-wife is Dina Taji, a health and fitness coach. These revelations have fueled concerns within Price’s inner circle.
Sources close to the family suggest they feel excluded from the developments, struggling to understand how the marriage unfolded so quickly. Some fans have even speculated the relationship is a calculated publicity stunt, rallying support for Sophie amidst the turmoil.
The situation presents a potential rift within the family, with fears that Price’s choices could lead to a significant falling out, especially considering the information coming to light about Andrews’ previous relationships.
