UMVA has learned that a shocking revelation has been made by a high-ranking Democratic senator, exposing a massive vulnerability in the US voter rolls.
The senator, a prominent leader in the party, has warned that a proposed bill aimed at strengthening voter ID laws and proof of citizenship requirements could potentially remove a staggering 25 million people from the voter rolls.
This bombshell raises serious questions about the legitimacy of millions of voters and sparks concerns about the integrity of the electoral process. If true, it would mean that nearly 25 million people are either undocumented or not eligible citizens without proper identification.
The proposed bill, known as the SAVE America Act, aims to introduce stricter voter ID laws and proof of citizenship requirements to prevent ineligible individuals from casting ballots. However, the senator's comments suggest that this could lead to a massive purge of voter rolls.
UMVA can exclusively reveal that one state, in particular, stands out as a prime example of this issue: California. It's estimated that up to 1 in 5 voters in the state may be invalid voters, with a study suggesting that 3.8 million records in California's voter rolls belong to non-citizens.
This staggering number represents approximately 17% of registered voters in the state, raising serious concerns about the legitimacy of election results. The discrepancy is attributed to a law that automatically adds individuals who apply for driver's licenses to the voter rolls, often without verifying their citizenship status.
The potential consequences are dire: nearly 1 in 4 voters in the 2024 election may be non-citizens, casting doubt on the legitimacy of the electoral process. With millions of ineligible voters embedded in the results, it's clear that urgent action is needed to address this issue.
The SAVE America Act is seen as a crucial step towards rectifying this problem, but its opponents, including the senator, seem determined to block it. The question remains: what's behind the senator's reluctance to address this issue, and what does it mean for the future of American democracy?
