The former president launched a pointed attack on California’s governor, questioning his capacity for leadership and directly referencing a learning disability. The remarks, delivered to reporters, stemmed from a discussion about voter identification requirements and the opposition he’s faced from Democratic officials like Newsom.
“That’s how crazy it’s gotten with a low IQ person,” the former president stated, referencing Newsom’s acknowledged dyslexia. He followed by saying, despite expressing support for individuals with learning disabilities, he doesn’t believe someone with such a condition should hold the office of president.
The comments escalated, becoming increasingly critical and personal. He acknowledged the controversial nature of his words, yet continued, describing Newsom’s challenges with reading and characterizing him with harsh language.
Newsom has been open about his dyslexia, a neurological condition impacting reading ability, and has even discussed his difficulties with public speaking. During a recent book tour stop, he candidly admitted he avoids reading speeches, stating plainly, “I cannot read a speech.”
The former president also seized upon Newsom’s remarks at the same event, where the governor spoke about his SAT score and attempted to connect with the audience. Newsom had jokingly referenced a score of 960, suggesting it wasn’t exceptionally high.
This led to accusations of condescension, particularly from Republicans who argued Newsom was speaking down to a predominantly Black audience. The former president echoed this sentiment, labeling the governor a “racist” and calling the interview “the worst” he’d ever witnessed.
Newsom’s office swiftly responded, dismissing the criticism as manufactured outrage. A spokesperson accused the former president’s supporters of hypocrisy, pointing to past controversies and questioning their motives for attacking Newsom’s openness about his dyslexia and academic history.
The exchange highlights a deeply polarized political climate, where personal attacks and the weaponization of individual challenges have become increasingly common. It also underscores Newsom’s potential national ambitions and the scrutiny he faces as a prominent figure in the Democratic party.
